Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
BSD Operating Systems

EuroBSDCon 2004 26

Posted by Hemos from the report-from-the-front dept.
Anonymous Reward writes "During the final weekend of October, nearly 200 people attended EuroBSDCon in Karlsruhe, Germany. The event offered a keynote by Apple's Jordan Hubbard, 23 talks organized in two tracks, a social event inside Luigi Colani's exhibition, and multiple coffee breaks to socialize. ONLamp.com has just published a report with funny pics..."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

EuroBSDCon 2004 More

EuroBSDCon 2004

Comments Filter:

  • Honestly (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Nimrangul ( 599578 ) on Monday November 29, 2004 @01:38PM (#10944504) Journal
    Federico there thinks these kinds of conferences should be expanded to be more of a bonding time for the various BSD related projects and I agree with that. However, he does not think they should be like the Hackathons of OpenBSD; I disagree there.

    I think that it would be a very interesting thing to have a conference where as many developers as possible get together for a week long party and idea mixer.

    One where the developers of things like OpenBGPd could talk straight to the developers of FreeBSD about how to properly integrate it, showing what was done to make it all work on OpenBSD and getting it to on FreeBSD.

    Where people that make the systems and tools are face to face with one another and actually interact. How better can anyone spot the various pros and cons of the BSDs and improve on them then bringing together the people that work on the different codebases and getting them to talk and read eachother's stuff.

    I am not saying that putting Darren Reed and Daniel Hartmeier in seats right next to each other would be the best thing, but getting people together really could help out the quality of all the projects.

  • There are more BSD than Linux boxes.. (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Homology ( 639438 ) on Monday November 29, 2004 @04:54PM (#10946576)
    Yep, this must come as a terrible blow to the "BSD is dead" crowd ;-)

    More proof that BSD are a lively corpse : "By the way, some time ago I heard an advocacy speech by Murray Stokely who said something amazing that I think we should write everywhere. If you take Linux as a unique movement, then it is bigger than FreeBSD, but if you take each distribution (per Netcraft's Linux OS detection statistics), then FreeBSD has more users than Red Hat. Did you know that?"

    • I won't argue that BSD is dead, but, to the BSD crowd: stop being eliteist about having no "distros" and being so complete. I think it is a great OS, no doubt. If I needed to host a dedicated server, OpenBSD would be my choice. But please, linux distros are not the same as BSD "flavours", because they are built on the same kernel, and can run the same code *with no modification*. The underlying system is the same, but the userland tools are different. Please stop just coming up with reasons why your be

      • Re:There are more BSD than Linux boxes.. (Score:4, Insightful)

        by Nimrangul ( 599578 ) on Monday November 29, 2004 @10:19PM (#10949540) Journal
        My OpenBSD can run most anything for Linux systems too, no modifications, just install some stuff from ports. Anyhow, on with the real post.

        Unfortunately, to some it is trying to destroy the BSDs. I don't much like the Linux systems' users proclaiming how dead BSD is now because of Linux' existance, doesn't stop people from saying it. And in the other way, Linux systems' users don't take too kindly to BSD people talking about how screwed up the way the Linux operating systems are developed and how shitty the code is to read.

        I would say that the two sides of the trolling have taken things that are partially based on fact and turned them into big stinking horse loads.

        Such is life, BSDs have had their ability to penetrate the market limited by the existance of an alternative that some companies like to use in accordance with buzzwords.

        Linux systems' development are less structured, from the kernel to the bringing together of the systems, at least from the eyes of anyone that has seen a more structured development style, this is seen as a bad thing. And the kernel code is not as well coded and commented as other systems, the functionality I cannot say is bad, but the reading is hard.

        I would not say that this makes Linux a piece of crap out to destroy the BSDs, I would simply say that I greatly dislike the way it is developed. I also happen to prefer the more structured form of userland used by BSDs.

        I prefer to take a look at things on a system by system basis, the one that to me makes the most sense is OpenBSD. It only needs one floppy and a nic to install, it has very clear man pages and as long as you read up first you are good to go for asking the community about damn near anything. That doesn't make Gentoo the evil anti-OpenBSD, nor is SuSE, Fedora, Slack or Mandrake; hell, I had a damned hard time trying to install any of them so I must be completely out there and outside the norm of computer users.

        There are avantages to the way in which your kernel of choice is made and disadvantages; that your core developers don't control or know all the code is a disadvantage, that you have a far greater number of code submissions is an advantage. I may not agree with it, but that doesn't stop it, so keep going, it really won't hurt me any.

        • I think it is safe to say that neither system will die in the forseeable future, unless something rather strange happens. I think it is just the "1337 h4x0rZ" that bash BSD for no reason. The main reason I use Linux instead: better desktop functionality, documentation, and support. If the BSDs had done this when they had the chance, linux would be dead.

Slashdot Top Deals

Garbage In -- Gospel Out.

Close