FreeBSD 4.9 Code Freeze 136
lewiz writes "FreeBSD Release Engineering have announced that the code freeze in preparation for 4.9-RELEASE (scheduled for 29th September) will begin on 25th August. Also 4.9-RC is tentatively scheduled for 12th September. A full list of dates can be found on the Release Process page."
In Other News... (Score:5, Funny)
Let's hear from all of the excited /. readers! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Let's hear from all of the excited /. readers! (Score:4, Interesting)
Sure, no one seems to care now. However, wait until the SCO gestapo starts really trying to nail down their "licensing fees" from users. FreeBSD will see a huge influx of new users, migrating over from Linux.
Re:Let's hear from all of the excited /. readers! (Score:5, Funny)
In the meantime FreeBSD uses will be content to stay out of the limelight while Slashdot fights those terribly important battles.
Be gentle... (Score:1)
Please disabuse me.
Re:Be gentle... (Score:1, Insightful)
They are enough alike that GNU/Linux users should be shouting down the BSD is dying trolls in the same way the BSD proponents should be helping out WRT the Linux lawsuit of SCO. Preceived 'leaders' like Linus, Alan Cox, et la of the 'linux movement' would be the obvious choices to lead by example. Another example would be Miguel de Icaza.
Instead, you have people like Bruce Perens saying 'its not my job to support BSD' (Yet he claims to be an Open Source advocate), the Open Source Develo
Re:Let's hear from all of the excited /. readers! (Score:2)
Let's assume for a minute that
Re:Let's hear from all of the excited /. readers! (Score:5, Informative)
Now, if there was a completely new scheduler or virtual memory system, or a couple data-corruption on unmount bugs, that would be exciting. But in FreeBSD, that sort of thing doesn't get into the STABLE branch.
Re:Let's hear from all of the excited /. readers! (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Let's hear from all of the excited /. readers! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Let's hear from all of the excited /. readers! (Score:5, Interesting)
Check the FreeBSD open issues list [freebsd.org] to get a snapshot.
Let's hear from all of the excited /. readers! (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Let's hear from all of the excited /. readers! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:4.12 (Score:1)
4.9, 4.10, 4.11 and 4.12 = VERY STABLE
The 5.X branch should become 'just' STABLE by then.
Re:4.12 (Score:1)
Re:Let's hear from all of the excited /. readers! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Let's hear from all of the excited /. readers! (Score:4, Interesting)
There is no Chinese equivalent that I've ever found and others have noted the same.
Re:Poul-Henning Kamp ruined FreeBSD (Score:1)
Re:Poul-Henning Kamp ruined FreeBSD (Score:1)
Sorry, but on my BSD machine (a modest P3-450) 5.x kills 4.x in speed, features, and usability.
Re:Poul-Henning Kamp ruined FreeBSD (Score:1)
Re:Poul-Henning Kamp ruined FreeBSD (Score:1)
My point is that, as much as Dragonfly BSD sounds fun, and I'm sure that it'll actually run someday, I'll use official FreeBSD. At least that way I'll have a working ports. And, a bugs forum that actually exists. And, a system that runs now.
Why even use FBSD 4.x if you have no need for new features? 4.4 BSD Lite i
Re:Poul-Henning Kamp ruined FreeBSD (Score:1)
Re:Poul-Henning Kamp ruined FreeBSD (Score:2, Interesting)
There is nothing worse than your desktop crashing, it's horrible. This is why Linux is an unacceptable choice to me in terms of a *nix desktop. Even crashing at the end of a 13 day uptime is unacceptable because it points at flaws in the system that can manifest themself at a time of their choosing; I don't like that. Well, there are other reasons I choose FreeBSD over Linux, but those aren't important. My main point is that, I want a reliable desktop OS,
Re:Poul-Henning Kamp ruined FreeBSD (Score:2)
An interesting claim (Score:1, Funny)
Now there is something that Linux can't claim. An operating system *SO* easy to use, that cigarettes can use it.
If a mindless cig can use FreeBSD 5.1, is Joe SixPack far behind?
Re:*BSD not dying (Score:2, Interesting)
Features List (Score:5, Informative)
Rus
Re:Features List (Score:5, Informative)
Loud and Proud, Put Away That Silly Shroud (Score:5, Insightful)
I was wondering, can any of the people who seem to be badmouthing FreeBSD all the time code? If so, have you contributed at least a line of code to making your much beloved Linux better? If so... Wait a minute, I'm talking to myself now.
Seriously though, if you are not contributing in any way, but still think that just being a fan makes you superior to other teams and their fans, you should think about this: the game is not about you, you're just observers and if your team should cease to exist, you wouldn't know what to do with a football to save your life. So put your scarf on, cheer like a good sport, but leave the criticism to those who actually play the game.
OFFTOPIC: but please help a n00b out (Score:1, Interesting)
And another thing. Are there any plans in the future of the FreeBSD project where binary updates will be officially su
Re:OFFTOPIC: but please help a n00b out (Score:2, Interesting)
I don't know of any commerical backup utilties, but Freebsd supports things like Amanda.
I typically use a simple dump script for backing up 5.x systems:
Dump will do a snapshot in case of any file system changes during the dump. FYI, a make world usually isn't needed, as you can just re-make that particular peice of code, or rebuild the kernel if it is a kernel change.
The big new feature appears to be... (Score:1, Informative)
Neat! (Score:1)
Oh well, looking forward to the 5.2 release, however, it is good to see that 4.x series are continuing to be developed as the temptation by some uname groups to focus more on the sexy/cool version rather than the boring maintainance work that is required.
Re:Neat! (Score:2)
FreeBSD under the Vanilla Sky, FreeBSD will NEVER die...
Re:What I know about *BSD... (Score:2)
Though you are probably right.
Re:My trolls are not idiotic! (Score:5, Informative)
so I will answer
1. It is dying
-Wrong
2. It has no GUI
-Wrong
3. It is fragmented
-This is a good thing
4. It is associated with SCO
5. It has no games
-Wrong
6. It is run only by geeks
-Um no comment
7. It is unusable by Grandmas
-nor is linux
8. It has fewer than 500 users
-Wrong
9. You can not install it on a pentium
-Nope
10. You cannot apt-get it
-Correct, use have to make; make install
Re:What I know about *BSD... (Score:1)
Re:Lameness filter mod time I want to read about B (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Lameness filter mod time I want to read about B (Score:2)
Re:Lameness filter mod time I want to read about B (Score:1)
404: Parent Post punctuation not found.
Re:*BSD is dying (Score:1)
Users of FreeBSD (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Users of FreeBSD (Score:2)
Re:*BSD is dying (Score:2)
Of course, no one really knows any of the above numbers with any reliability, so we should all just make up new ones anyway!
Re:gawdam.... (Score:1)
Now I'm off to search the newsgroups for a good flame fest to read.
Parent is troll. (Score:1, Offtopic)
Re:FreeBSD problems (Score:2)
The over use of this template may have made this variable troll rather funny some time ago (circa 1998-99), but it has become so overused that it no longer has the strength of parody that once made it seem humorous, and it has been ages since anyone has been taken in by the "Holy War" troll (except in the manner that I am now, but I don't believe that a criticism of your trolling style can legitimately be conside
Re:FreeBSD problems (Score:2)
Re:Goggle confirms it - *BSD is dying! (Score:2)
Searched the web for linux is dying.
Results 1 - 10 of about 126,000. Search took 0.19 seconds.
So it looks as if Linux is dying about 10 times as much. Now let's look at this one:
Searched the web for windows is dying.
Results 1 - 10 of about 377,000. Search took 0.24 seconds.
Sorry BSD, but Linux and Windows are both dying a lot more than you.