FreeBSD 5.1 beta2 Now Available 32
Dan writes "FreeBSD Release Engineering Team's Scott Long has uploaded the 5.1 i386 Beta2 release of FreeBSD. He will be uploading the alpha release, work is under way to get a beta2 for sparc64 and pc98. Downloads for i386 are available here."
Of course... (Score:5, Informative)
In fact, in the future it might not be a bad idea to have Slashdot only link to freebsdmirrors.org. I know that the FreeBSD people have gotten pissed in the past about that...
Re:Of course... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Of course... (Score:2)
Is there a way to originate bittorrent from Unix? It looked like you needed Windows, and those of us serious enough about FreeBSD to care may not have Windows!
Re:Of course... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Of course... (Score:5, Informative)
Just because the server can handle the load doesn't mean that its network connection has the bandwidth. The OS is often irrelevent.
In fact, in many cases of "slashdotting" the servers (whatever they're running) do fine, but the network "pipe" isn't big enough. There's a bit of a positive feed back loop as well, since the tiny bandwidth available for any given connection makes it slower, and thus take longer, and thus increase the number of simultaneous connections the server has to handle. The latter can be hell on database backends (a common failure mode when DB-driven sites are overloaded) and on a poorly-configured server can run it out of system resources as well.
As for FreeBSD 5.1-BETA2, I'm sure it could handle the load, but it's not going to be as stable as FreeBSD 4.8, and the FreeBSD folks will freely admit as much. That's why it's "BETA," and it's also why the 5.x branch most likely won't be labeled "STABLE" until 5.2. Until then, the place to test it is as a member of a server farm, where if it does happen to have trouble the load will immediately be taken over by other machines. It really isn't appropriate to use beta software as a stand-alone FTP server. That doesn't mean that people won't try (just like there are servers out there running Linux 2.5). But it would be irresponsible to do this for any server that is mission-critical.
Re:Of course... (Score:2)
Not completely true. It's called beta because it are the test-CD images for the 5.1 release.
Re:Of course... (Score:2)
No; see the schedule [freebsd.org]. You're thinking of 5.1-RC1 (the "release candidate").
Re:Of course... (Score:2)
Re:Of course... (Score:2)
Re:Heh all of *BSD is alpha (Score:1)
That's what happens when you don't upgrade past 0.01.
Re:tag ? (Score:4, Informative)
Until -stable will be split off around 5.2 release, it's still HEAD, or for the purpose of cvsup, tag=.
Re:tag ? (Score:3, Informative)
There is no such branch; snapshots are not branched. Nor are they tagged.
Until -stable will be split off around 5.2 release, it's still HEAD, or for the purpose of cvsup, tag=.
There is already a RELENG_5_0 for 5.0-RELEASE patches. There will be a RELENG_5_1 branch created around the end of the month.
5.1 Release Process [freebsd.org]
Extended partitions (Score:2)
Re:Extended partitions (Score:4, Insightful)
There is a workaround though. Convert that logical partition to a primary partition. This will probably involve some shuffling around, so get a good repartitioner. Once you have a free primary partition, install away.
Or do what I do, and use a separate harddrive. At one time this was prohibitive, but drives are so cheap now that it's the easy and simple solution.
Torrent for MiniDist ISO (please mod up) (Score:2, Informative)
I've put a torrent up for the MiniDist ISO:
ftp://ftp3.freebsd.org/pub/torrents/5.1-BETA2-i38