OpenBSD 3.1 End Of Life 37
Dan writes "OpenBSD team's Miod Vallat says that due to the upcoming release of OpenBSD 3.3, the 3.1-STABLE branch will have no more fixes committed to its branch after June 1, 2003 and should therefore be considered out of regular maintenance."
So what you're saying... (Score:2, Funny)
OK this gave me a SHOCK!! (Score:2, Insightful)
I thought its the EOL for OpenBSD.
And I was just gettin interested with all the OpenBSD stories in slashdot these days.
How dare they??!? (Score:3, Funny)
BSD 3.1 is dying!!! (Score:3, Funny)
Oh, just mod me down and get it over with. :-)
It's already dead (Score:1)
Easy update? (Score:2, Insightful)
OpenBSD yellow 3.0 GENERIC#94 i386
Hmm. That's not a good sign.
Does anyone know if there's an easy way to update a box to a new version of OpenBSD without having to reinstall everything? Something like the "make world" from FreeBSD would be great.
--saint
Re:Easy update? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:End of Life: *BSD is dying (Score:1)
Netcraft now confirms
BSD holds 24 of the 25 longest uptime records [netcraft.com]. The top two servers have been up four and a half years without a reboot.
Fact: BSD does it longer!
That is to say (Score:1)
Ok ok, so I'm just Trolling, Ed
Re:You basturds (Score:2)
actually redhat announced that it is EOLing all versions one year after the intro of the next version, even for those of us that pay for support for our current 7.2- systems. We have talked about this in several areas, although I don't see a particular article posted on it.
But it has been talked about a fair amount.
OpenBSD 3.1 *End Of Life* (Score:3, Funny)