Usenix 2002 FreeBSD Dev Summit Notes 30
S K Medusa writes "The FreeBSD Project has put up a page detailing the developments that took place at the Usenix 2002 FreeBSD Developer Summit. Here's the full lowdown. Lots of interesting discussion on SMP, performance issues, new arch targets and the release process. Well worth a look."
BSD not a bad thing (Score:1)
So mine are simple: it's good to see BSD Unix *in general* getting attention still, and better to know that the little devil is still kicking. It works, it can talk TCP/IP, and it's not Micro$oft.
Yes, I'm a Linux user. Deal with it.
Re:BSD not a bad thing (Score:1, Informative)
Re:BSD not a bad thing (Score:2)
I find the slashboxes quite handy: Daily Deamon News, BSDToday and FreeBSD Diary.
Re:BSD not a bad thing (Score:1, Informative)
Re:BSD not a bad thing (Score:1)
Thats funny. The release of BSD4.2 in 1984 included the TCP/IP suite of networking protocols -- many years before Linux was even invented. It works very well, you can be sure.
Meeting Pictures Available (Score:3, Informative)
-Matt
Cool.... (Score:1)
A real Netcraft confirmation (Score:1, Informative)
Re:A real Netcraft confirmation (Score:1)
Re:A real Netcraft confirmation (Score:1)
Why is open source having such a hard time? (Score:3, Funny)
"An OpenBSD presentation slide" [backplane.com]
Note the lack of pointless animations to drive home the point that there is a lack of content. Note the lack of gradiant/textured background to "enhance" the slide in some way as to somehow looking "professionally done with Power Point" (cute font is a good start though). Notice the lack of bullets to point out that you didn't have much to say in the first place, and just have a few points with bullets.
Most importantly (from the slide), "Recently improved":
tcron/popen.c; md5(1); altqd parser; hash/rmd160.c, etc..
Any chance of a mortal person understanding even remotely what that means? That looks suspicously like content.