rho writes "Stephan Somogyi at MacWEEK trumpets everybody's favorite security-concious *nix OpenBSD with an article telling why he likes it. Pretty plain jane, but introduces OpenBSD to a new audience (i.e. Mac users)."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
How can "OpenBSD rules" possibly be off-topic? It's entirely on-topic for this story, and since this *is* an OpenBSD story, it can't even be called a flamebait (it insults no one else, and certainly not the OpenBSD users).
...and not the best-written piece I've seen on macweek, but reasonable enough. And of course it's another entertaining snub of MacOS (Hey Apple, I'm using OpenBSD because it doesn't suck! Nyah nyah!)
I really would have liked to have seen the article say something about the code review OpenBSD experiences. Surely someone can set this guy straight...
I'd love to have Open's level of security, but it won't run on my older Mac clone (PowerBase 240) and its 3rd party USB card. Guess I'll try NetBSD [netbsd.org] instead. Net runs on pretty much anything made after the last Toaster Mac [apple.com].
Re:Why I don't use OpenBSD (Score:1)
Just checked, NetBSD still doesn't support the Performa x200 series. (the "rotten" apples).
Pity, I bought two for a good bottle of wine
Anyway, back to Linux then. At least Mklinux (www.mklinux.org) seems to have working beta versions of a kernel for these machines.
Off topic???? (Score:2)
Yes, hardly exciting (Score:2)
I really would have liked to have seen the article say something about the code review OpenBSD experiences. Surely someone can set this guy straight...
Works for me! (Re:Why I don't use OpenBSD) (Score:1)
Why I don't use OpenBSD (Score:2)
I'd love to have Open's level of security, but it won't run on my older Mac clone (PowerBase 240) and its 3rd party USB card. Guess I'll try NetBSD [netbsd.org] instead. Net runs on pretty much anything made after the last Toaster Mac [apple.com].