FreeBSD Plays Big Role on the Internet 5
ocipio writes "The article on sfgate.com discusses the use of FreeBSD on the largest Internet companies in the world. FreeBSD is used by Yahoo!, Hotmail, MindSpring, UUNet, and Verio. BSD will also get an indirect boost next year as Apple releases Mac OS X. Comparing the BSD family to Linux, BSDi's Rose said, "We think we have a product that's more reliable, scalable and robust for high-performance, infrastructure-grade computing." Yahoo!'s Chief David Filo agrees, noting he couldn't imagine moving to a proprietary system. "
While it is nice to see articles touting FreeBSD (Score:1)
-sirket
Re:While it is nice to see articles touting FreeBS (Score:1)
Now for some real news:
Did you know that you can now get access (source license) to different BSD-versions from 1BSD via 2.xBSD, 3BSD and upto 4.3BSD-Reno ?? Yes,siree!
A click through license available a here. [sco.com]. PUPS [adfa.edu.au] archives contain a lot of other material too...
Now just dig out that VAX 11/780 [netbsd.org] from the closet and start hacking!
The article may mean little to us... (Score:2)
-Adam
Trust is a trick that dogs play. They don't want you to know how delicious they are.
The Same Ol' Stuff (Score:1)
The articles I would like to definitely see is how a company incorporated xBSD and what their success and horror stories are. Another thing I'd like to find out is how the companies go about getting support or help on xBSD if some large issue occurs.
Re:and now the bad news (Score:3)
Most people don't need the reliability/security/speed of a BSD these days. Those that do, well, we seek them out. That's why market share for the BSDs is slipping; not because there aren't more BSD machines coming online, but because there are far more user machines (i.e. not bulletproof OpenBSD servers) proportionally coming online.
Believe me, when some of the larger sites out there start to find out that NT sucks harder than a Studebaker vacuum cleaner, and that Linux isn't the answer to everything (yeah yeah mod me down), there will be *many* conversions to BSD. Until then, market share will suffer as Linux continues to get the hype, NT continues to get the $ale$, and BSD continues to get overlooked.
The BSD's are a niche operating system. They are never going to have the mass appeal of a Windows GUI or a Windows GUI ripoff (KDE?), but that's OK; they don't need to. The BSDs attract people who are serious about building clean, stable, robust systems. They don't need to attract a large market share; the people who run BSD systems already aren't going to abandon them for Red Hat or NT anytime soon. Remember when Hotmail tried to move to NT?
It only took me about 6 months to figure out that I wanted to run OpenBSD on most of my servers. It might take other people longer, but they'll figure it out.
Oh, and I'd forget about a BSD "Summit" anytime soon; the grudges that caused the NetBSD/OpenBSD rift still sting a little too much.