Yearly FreeBSD Foundation Fundraising Campaign Is On 83
An anonymous reader writes "The FreeBSD Foundation's annual year-end fundraising drive is currently running. Their goal this year is US$ 1M, and they're currently at US$ 427K. In 2013, the efforts that were funded were from the last drive were: Native iSCSI kernel stack, Updated Intel graphics chipset support, Integration of Newcons, UTF-8 console support, Superpages for ARM architecture, and Layer 2 networking updates. Also various conferences and summit sponsorships, as well as hardware purchases for the Project. The Foundation is a US 501(c)3 non-profit, so your donations (if in the US) are tax-deductible. Some of the larger 2013 (corporate?) sponsors so far are NetApp, LineRate, WhatsApp, and Tarsnap."
Re:For surely (Score:4, Insightful)
FreeBSD isnt for the desktop. Next time you need a quick-deploy firewall with advanced features in a virtual environment, and you stumble across pfSense or m0n0wall, remember to thank FreeBSD for making such a stable system.
My experience with it has been limited to a few appliances (freenas, pfsense, etc), but I've generally found it to be way more stable and better performing than linux alternatives (openfiler, untangle). Im sure there are a myriad of technical and non-technical reasons for that, but either way, I hope the FreeBSD folks keep it up.
Re:For surely (Score:5, Informative)
Check out PC-BSD sometime. http://www.pcbsd.org/ [pcbsd.org]
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Note you can turn an existing FreeBSD install into PC-BSD too [pcbsd.org]. Basically a case of switching pkgng to their repository, installing a metapackage and running a few bootstrap commands.
Re: For surely (Score:1)
Wut? I used to use FreeBSD as desktop OS before switching to OSX.
It's not only a server system. Works perfectly fine as productive desktop system.
Re: For surely (Score:4, Informative)
Works fine for me on chips supported by dri. The dri2 support is being nailed down now and once that's in it'll work fine on the same bleeding edge Intel hardware Linux does.
I'm the wifi guy. The WiFi is now up to date on Intel and Atheros 11n. I'd like some help with broadcom. I'll do the Intel and Atheros 11ac stuff early next year.
I'm currently evaluating power management. FreeBSD and xorg on my ivybridge lenovo x230 draw 9w when idle. We are ok at using the deep sleep states per core and package but there's room for improvement.
I'm making the turbo boost stuff work out of the box. Powerd is .. Dumb. Modern CPUs are fine at running at the highest clock rate but spending time in c3 and lower. So I'll fix powers to do that on these chips.
I'm using an x230 in vesa mode but it works fine if you use the new DRI and xorg code. I do day to day hacking on the lenovo t400, mostly due to the cardbus slot I still use.
The only thing missing is hotplug express card.
So.. It's not perfect. 10.0 will not be laptop great. I expect 10.1 with updated dri2 and xorg along with Intel WiFi fixes and my power management stuff to be great.
There.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:For surely (Score:4, Insightful)
Stability comes in many forms, not simply up time.
For example, Linux has a long, long history of badly managed architectural transitions:
a.out to ELF
libc to glibc
virtual memory manager musical chairs
filesystem flavor of the month
32bit to 64bit
package manager du jour
sound
MAKEDEV/devfs/udev.
Stack on top of that the variety of distributions, with their own often wildly different ideas about where things should live and how they should be managed, frequently causes stability issues by introducing human error points. Many of those ideas are also inherently bad and affect stability, such as RedHat and friends throwing everything and the kitchen sink into /usr. -Yes, some packages can be retargeted...but not many, and doing so breaks convention (albeit a bad one) causing the same sort of management stability issues that multiple distros cause just on the local level.
All of that ends up being a make-work program for Linux System Administrators...honestly at leat 50% of your daily job only exists because of the instability of the Linux ecosystem.
Linux (all distros, all of it) is a Configuration Manager's worst nightmare.
IPv6 status on pFsense? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Pretty sure its golden as of 2.1.
FreeBSD Desktop (Score:2)
I'd have to disagree. I'm using FreeBSD on my laptop right now. I think it makes a great desktop. Linux supports more hardware. But if (and it's a big IF) your hardware is supported by FreeBSD, then you're better off running it.
Re: (Score:3)
At my last company we developed an online ordering system for restaurants in the mid 2000's and deployed on FreeBSD over Linux using Pair Networks as our server & colo provider. When younger developers who only knew of Linux asked why my response was, "I don't want to waist time with the systems end of things. BSD will sit there and do it's job." Granted a lot of the backend was also written in Perl.
Once the software was written there wasn't a lot of maintenance, especially once we replaced MySQL wit
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
My (Free)BSD desktop works very well, and it doesn't constantly guess incorrectly about what I want it to do.
"fucktard"? Really? Is that you again Linus?
Re: (Score:2)
...I need to start my own... (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
My brother would donate.
Re: (Score:1)
The mouse pad I use for my Ubuntu machine is an OS2 Warp one.
It works as well as I would assume Warp would still today.
Haiku & osFree (Score:2)
osFree (Score:2)
Corporate donors (Score:2)
As I recall, FreeBSD provided some of the key underpinnings to Mac OS X and iOS. Surely Apple can spare some of its $90B back to the effort. $1M is a rounding error compared to $90B...
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
The reason why it is stripping GPL is because it is unfriendly for corporations including Apple and others to distribute.
The GPL forces to give the source code away even if it is just .0001% of the actual product even if you link it! So if I write a cout "Hello World\n!"; but the iostream.h is GPL then my rights to use my work are hindered.
Whether that is more free is personal flamewar here on slashdot and I do not want to be modded down for taking sides here if corporations should be forced to give out t
Re: (Score:2)
CLANG is a big pronoent of this movement away from the GPL
CLANG was started and heavily funded by Apple. But without GPL, Apple will never give back, right?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Usage (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Reasons to reject GPL3 (Score:2)
Total non-sequitur. Apple does contribute to FreeBSD, both in terms of employing some FreeBSD devs, as well as donating certain software to be merged upstream w/ the project. LLVM/Clang being one major example.
Apple is stripping out GPL3 based components, due to certain clauses in the license that make it pretty hostile to business - like the one granting patent rights to everybody in case a certain component uses a certain patent which the contributor holds. But FreeBSD is doing the same - LLVM/Clang
Re: (Score:2)
Apple is stripping out GPL3 based components
More specifically, Apple does not and never has allowed GPLv3 code into the building. They're not stripping out GPLv3 code, they're staying with old versions of projects that switched to GPLv3 until a permissively licensed replacement is finished. This is not a strategy exclusive to Apple - a lot of companies were unhappy with GPLv2 and now find GPLv3 quite scary. We've had quite a few companies start to contribute to FreeBSD and related projects as a result of GPLv3.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
FreeBSD provided some of the key underpinnings to Mac OS X and iOS.
Not to mention JUNOS, the operating system running on Juniper Networks routers. The JUNOS kernel is based on FreeBSD.
Anyone using Facebook, Twitter, AT&T, Verizon (I can go on for about an hour) will have their packets routed through a box runing JUNOS.
Come on Kevin [juniper.net], I'm sure you can donate a bit...
Re: (Score:2)
They were "silver" sponsors last year. Just wait, I suspect they'll pitch in before the campaign is up.
Re: (Score:1)
I believe Cisco iOS (not apple's) is made from BSD Unix (4.4 tapes from Berkely) or was over a decade ago. I do not know if it still is but BSD is really good at packets.
BSD Unix 4.2 invented TCP/IP and the modern internet from arpanet so it is not surprising. :-)
I guess working with tiny tiny machines compared to today you needed no bloat and very efficient mathmatical data algorithms and structures made by people at Berkely writting master theises papers rather than volunteers growing it in Linux as a wee
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
LLVM started outside of Apple. Apple hired some key LLVM developers, and put several of their own on it too. They've kept it public because enough people outside Apple are still contributing, and sure, that's great. So far everyone benefits. If Apple decided to stop publishing their LLVM updates and took it private, FreeBSD would have to fork it or move to another compiler.
But none of that is specific to FreeBSD, and none of those fund core FreeBSD development (which could happen just as easily with GCC
Re: (Score:2)
LLVM started as a university project. It wasn't until after Apple hired Chris Lattner and shipped a GLSL stack that other people started contributing in significant amounts. Chris offered LLVM to the FSF before Apple hired him, but they didn't want it. Clang (the C/C++/Objective-C front end, which is the bit most people think of as LLVM) was created in-house at Apple and open sourced, as was libc++. Now, there are about as many Google employees working on LLVM and Clang and a lot of people from elsewher
Re: (Score:1)
Stop and consider... (Score:4, Interesting)
FreeBSD probably isn't useful to you every day. Maybe some of your net traffic will go through a FreeBSD box, but that box could be replaced by just about anything really. However, I'm not trying to say that FreeBSD is useless or irrelevant - what I want to say is that FreeBSD has some excellent out-of-band uses.
I think people should consider the value of the educational, developmental, experimental and competitive opportunities that FreeBSD provides. We need projects and communities which have low hanging fruit for beginners and we need projects that are ready to give different approaches to problems a go - so that the rest of us on whatever OS can learn from it regardless of the success of the implementation.
The same goes for my favourite alternative OS - Haiku [haiku-os.org] which also contains some bits and pieces from FreeBSD for networking/wireless IIRC. (BTW, it has package management now and a lot of improvements to the native browser, and more.)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.scei.co.jp/ps4-license/ [scei.co.jp]
Re: (Score:3)
Fact is just about everything you use today contains parts of FreeBSD. TCP/IP Networking stack. Well Microsoft adopted that from FreeBSD back in the 1990's. There are more parts of Linux that came from the BSD's. Oh and let's not forget the most popular Unix Desktop OS MacOS X & iOS. Oh and now the PS4.
So yeah, FreeBSD is this obscure thing nobody knows about, but pieces of it are everywhere these days.
Re: (Score:2)
ClickAndPledge (Score:1)
I can't say that I'm terribly impressed with the pledge interface. You end up with a "transaction completed" page that doesn't detail the transaction nor does it refer you back to the original URL.
When I clicked "back" I hit an autoforward URL, so I'm hoping it was at least smart enough to put in a transaction ID and not attempt the transaction multiple times.
What the hell? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)