Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Sun Microsystems Operating Systems Software Unix BSD

OpenSolaris Boot Support For ZFS Root FS on x86 and SPARC 50

Posted by timothy
from the devilish-wings-spread-wider dept.
Derkjan de Haan writes "I am glad to see progress is being made on the the ability of OpenSolaris to boot from a ZFS filesystem: 'This putback provides the ability to boot the Solaris Operating System from a ZFS root file system on both x86 and SPARC platforms. Full ZFS boot and install support will be available in a subsequent build. Because of the phased putback, we recommend waiting for the full boot and install support rather than attempting to use the ZFS boot features separately.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

OpenSolaris Boot Support For ZFS Root FS on x86 and SPARC

Comments Filter:
  • by TheRaven64 (641858) on Sunday April 20, 2008 @01:21PM (#23135572) Journal
    This is an article about System V UNIX, and it's in the BSD category and tagged bsd. WTF?
  • Honk! Honk! (Score:5, Informative)

    by tripwirecc (1045528) on Sunday April 20, 2008 @01:23PM (#23135582)
    The OpenSolaris distribution can already install ZFS root and boot, based on the previous putback. This current putback makes it more robust, especially when it comes to finding the root device after having been swapped to a different port. What's still missing is multidisk pool and RAID-Z boot support.
  • by bhima (46039) * <Bhima@Pandava.gmail@com> on Sunday April 20, 2008 @01:57PM (#23135808) Journal
    I don't think booting from ZFS is all that interesting. I think expanding a RAID-Z pool is far more interesting: http://blogs.sun.com/ahl/entry/expand_o_matic_raid_z [sun.com]
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by TheRaven64 (641858)
      The reason booting is important is twofold. First, it means that you can simplify your configuration by having all of all of your disks managed by the ZFS storage pool manager. Secondly, it means that you get all of the nice transactional features from ZFS on your boot partition. If you upgrade your kernel or some modules to a broken one (for example) then you can easily restore to a previous snapshot at the next boot.
    • by NateTech (50881)
      Yawn. People willing to pay for Veritas File System have been able to do this for 10 years on the Solaris platform.

      While I like ZFS, it's really not all that "NEW". It's just a re-implementation of things available commercially.

      That makes it inexpensive, which is good for many -- but critical systems have been doing this kind of disk management for a very long time now.
  • by Marcion (876801) on Sunday April 20, 2008 @03:25PM (#23136394) Homepage Journal
    ... when does Linux get ZFS?
    • Re: (Score:1, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward
      Never, it is CDDL, and Linus won't have that in his baby.
    • by TheRaven64 (641858) on Sunday April 20, 2008 @03:56PM (#23136586) Journal
      First, in spite of the section, this article has nothing to do with BSD - it is about Solaris, which is a System V derivative. FreeBSD also has ZFS support, but does not have more than very limited support for ZFS booting (and none in the stable release, I believe).

      As to when Linux will get support for ZFS, it requires one of two things to happen. Either Linux developers need to do a clean-room reimplementation of ZFS, or they need to modify their license to one that isn't incompatible with many other Free Software licenses , including the CDDL.

      • by lakeland (218447)
        You missed the most likely option...

        Or Linux needs to get user mode filesystems up to the point you can store your mission-critical data on them.

        ZFS has been written ported to linux, I tried it last year but one of my tests was to pull power to the drive while it was mounted (but not doing anything) I lost all data on the drive beyond (easy) recovery. My conclusion, it isn't ready for use on a Linux server yet.
        • FUSE is quite stable. It's ZFS FUSE that's unstable.

          -:sigma.SB

          • by lakeland (218447)
            I can believe that, though I haven't tested FUSE for much other than ZFS (just mythtvfs and sshfs and both for fun at home rather than production use). I also believe the ZFS code is stable and not prone to corrupting drives when power is lost.

            The problem is the current linux implmenetation of ZFS-FUSE.
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      by aliquis (678370)
      http://zfs-on-fuse.blogspot.com/ [blogspot.com]

      Except on fuse either when Sun goes GPL 2, or when both Sun and Linux goes GPL 3, or if Linux stop being GPL at all but uhm, yeah right ..
    • It requires some rouge kernel hackers that dont care about licensing, you know the kind the drive round on motor bikes, and break into Steve Ballmers office and upload from his desktop, not because they're too cheap to pay for an internet connection, but simply because they wanted chairs to patch up the holes in their pirate ship that's waiting of the cost.

      Yup the day we get those sort of rouge kernel hackers well get zfs in linux, but until then due to suns choice of license its not going to happen any soo
      • Re: (Score:1, Funny)

        by cptnapalm (120276)
        "It requires some rouge kernel hackers that dont care about licensing"

        Unfortunately, Linux kernel hackers are mostly license conscious. I also hear that they are mostly azure, like the Smurfs.
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by swordgeek (112599)
      Whenever the Linux zealots feel like putting down the "one-True-Holy-license" pitchforks and start to implement it.

      The code is out there. You're welcome to use it following the license under which it was released.
      • by JohnFluxx (413620)
        Um, what? It is not possible to put the zfs code into the kernel. It would be illegal to do so. Putting down pitchforks would not solve this problem.

As in certain cults it is possible to kill a process if you know its true name. -- Ken Thompson and Dennis M. Ritchie

Working...