FreeBSD 5.2-RC1 Released 116
Dan writes "FreeBSD Release Engineering Team's Scott Long has uploaded ISO images and FTP install bits for FreeBSD 5.2-RC1. i386, alpha, and pc98 are available now, amd64 will be available shortly, and sparc64 will be available shortly. Please test this as much as possible so that the FreeBSD Team can release a good 5.2-RELEASE next week. Testing focus for 5.2-RELEASE relates to PCM locking and performance issues, ATA driver improvements, GPT support for sysinstall, ATAng disk corruption issues, SMP and random_harvest panic, vinum data corruption, ACPI kernel module and reported NFS failures."
Re:Good news for people sticking with it. (Score:1)
Either that or he's really stupid to be using something not production ready in a mission critical application.
On Bizarro World (Score:5, Funny)
SCC makes you pay them $699 if you DON'T use Linux.
The recording industry sells all their material online, in a usable format, at a fair price
We don't, for one, welcome our new overlords.
Windows Security is not an oxymoron
All the trolls can't stop proclaiming how *BSD is so alive.
Who need Release-Candidates? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Who need Release-Candidates? (Score:1, Informative)
For anyone familiar with FreeBSD's legendary stability this is minor and can in fact be ignored, but for new users RC's are far better than CVS co on -CURRENT.
Re:Who need Release-Candidates? (Score:1)
Re:Who need Release-Candidates? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Who need Release-Candidates? (Score:2, Informative)
A slight exagerration. 5.2-RC1 pretty much is CURRENT. As I understand it, release engineering (or somebody) would say "OK, that looks pretty good" and then take a snapshot of CURRENT and dub it 5.2-RC1. Whatever changes may have happened to CURRENT in the last couple of days would be minor, as CURRENT is still preening for 5.2-RELEASE, and major and/or
Re:Who need Release-Candidates? (Score:2)
Re:Who need Release-Candidates? (Score:2)
Just got this last night (Score:2, Interesting)
and use a mirror! (Score:5, Informative)
then go to releases/ARCH/ISO-IMAGES/5.2-RC1
Dead Project release 5.2 RC1 (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Dead Project release 5.2 RC1 (Score:3, Informative)
Unfortunately my spare box at the moment is garbage, otherwise I'd jump at this. I haven't been able to get anything other than Windows working on it.
Re:Dead Project release 5.2 RC1 (Score:2)
My limited experience has been with 4.x.
Re:Dead Project release 5.2 RC1 (Score:3, Insightful)
The result of those releases is that they don't let a release out anymore without even more stringent testing. 4.x is a testament to the improved release scrutiny.
-sirket
Re:Dead Project release 5.2 RC1 (Score:2, Interesting)
Depending on your definition of "stable". I didn't use 5.0 much so I can't say anything there, but I've already found 5.1 at least as stable as Linux, or at times more stable considering some problems I've had on Linux. I won't say that 5x doesn't have issues, but I haven't encountered any really.
If my inital tests of 5.2 pan out (which I have no doubt they will) then I will finally begin the migration from Redhat 7.3 to FreeBSD. If I have
Re:Dead Project release 5.2 RC1 (Score:3, Interesting)
I use the ports to build everything and not pkg_add. The ports tree is quite broken in alot of area's.
No kernel panics I admit but it was almost as bad as Gentoo.
I switched back to 4.9 and I noticed the ports work and they are also more up to date.
Also I tried using just pkg_add under 5.1 and some of the apps were broken.
Still would not trust it yet.
Re:Dead Project release 5.2 RC1 (Score:2)
Care to tell us what you were unable to build from the ports tree?
Re:Dead Project release 5.2 RC1 (Score:2)
The other problem I had was with the nvidia driver.
However later on, I relized I was not supposed to use any -o settings, so I was at fault there since I modified
Also I got Mozilla to build but javascript would not run by default making it almost useless. I observed the same problem with 4.8. I
Re:Dead Project release 5.2 RC1 (Score:1)
Re:Dead Project release 5.2 RC1 (Score:1)
Re:Dead Project release 5.2 RC1 (Score:1)
Re:What does FreeBSD have over Linux? (Score:5, Insightful)
FreeBSD is very good for offering practical solutions to real world problems, based on a solid foundation. Bleedign edge technology only comes second to that.
Linux tries to push the envelope of Unix like development very succesfully, but at times forgoes the practical solution.
In the end, it doesn't matter that much. Sometimes you have to wait a bit longer in Linux before you get a practical solution for a problem, soemtimes you have to wait soem longer for FreeBSD to support a specific feature or piece of hardware.
Practical solutions?
It is things like having had 'accept filters' for a long time, that make it possible to wait for a complete http request before spendign any timeslices on the http server that needs to handle it, and thus preventing many context switches for example.
It is being able to reliably verify which uid is generating an outgoing packet in the standard ip filtering software for example.
Are those hitech/bleedign edge solutions? no, but they are practical, and provide solutions to real problems that allow you to get a lot more out of your hardware with very little investment of time and efford.
Do you need them? I don't for my workstation (tho it rubns FreeBSD, but that is more due to it being simpler to maintain a few machines with the same OS.
I do want them for my webserver and mailserver and such tho, there they improve control, security and performance quite a bit.
Re:What does FreeBSD have over Linux? (Score:5, Informative)
If you repeat a lie long enough do you hope to make it true?
Red Hat's policy for Red Hat Linux distributions is to provide maintenance for at least 12 months. [redhat.com] No 5 year offer....just a 1 year offer.
well-designed and thoroughly tested distros like Debian and Slackware are totally rock-solid.
That would be the same 'totally rock-solid' Debian project which was rooted via do_bkr() - a result found in the 'thoroughly tested' Linux kernel?
FreeBSD must be good (Score:2, Funny)
Seems like this nut runs a Windows or Linux business and feels threatened by FreeBSD!
Can't wait for FreeBSD 5.2 next week, this freak will go nuts!
Jails (Score:1)
What I would really like to see is multiple IP's and private System V IPC in jails. It doesn't look like it made it into 5.2, unfortunately....
--
OpenHosting [openhosting.com] Virtual Servers for the geeks.
two items (Score:1, Funny)
1) Haven't they asked you, repeatedly, (and besides that, isn't it better etiquette...) to point to a list of mirrors instead of directly to an FTP site?
2) Just saw an ad for Slashdot personals. Heh.
Me: So, you read slashdot?
Her: Yeah.
Me: I gotta get going now, nice meeting you.
WARNING: if upgrading via source (Score:1)
Graham