OpenBSD3.4 Shipping 55
skelley writes "As seen on deadly.org, OpenBSD 3.4 CDs have begin to ship. If you ordered one already, you should see a charge appear on your credit card (if that's how you paid) and you should expect to see your CD in the next few days to week (depending on where you are). The CDs are being shipped from Calgary. This is earlier than expected, but hey ... enjoy it!"
Isn't that a mistake? (Score:2)
I still can't order OpenBSD 3.4 throught its web site. Unless I am mistaken, I think this announcement was a little bit premature...
Re:Isn't that a mistake? (Score:3, Informative)
jon
New release, new song (Score:2)
The 3.1 song was the best. This one is weird - but nice lyrics.
Lots of changes in the release: looks like a large code audit, ProPolice in the kernel, libraries loaded at random addresses, W^X for i386. Looks good. Haven't used with OpenBSD since 2.8 (went to FreeBSD), but this I might try this one.
Re:New release, new song (Score:4, Interesting)
( OpenBSD PS was created out of a typical Theo spat with the IPF people - and has gone on to kick IPF's ass. PF is cool! )
Re:New release, new song (Score:2)
more info [benzedrine.cx]
I can't rememebr where, but somebody on the FreeBSD also mentioned poring it for 5.3 or so.
Re:New release, new song (Score:2)
Re:New release, new song (Score:4, Interesting)
Dunno how happy you'll be with it as a desktop system. My OpenBSD machine lives in the basement crawlspace, and I'm reasonably sure it doesn't have a monitor or keyboard at the moment. I don't know what it's like with a GUI.
Re:New release, new song (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:New release, new song (Score:2)
Eh -- I dunno. Everything targets Linux. Takes a lot less work to get stuff working on it, especially like video cards and stuff. Also, consider the better interactivity on 2.6. Not appropriate for servers yet, but should be fine for a plain old dekstop. OpenBSD can't even take full advantage of a P4 HT.
A firewall system is a different story. Your basic scrap computer will do just fine, as long as it can fit 2 PCI NIC's. It's be
Re:New release, new song (Score:2)
Not true at all. For just about anything except videocards, it's automatically detected and setup by the kernel. No need for kudzu, no messing with modules.conf or other options. No need to deal with unresolved kernel symbols, etc. Although it doesn't support as much hardware (it supports a very large portion of it though) it's hardware support is much better, in every way.
For videocards,
Re:Troll-in-one (Score:3, Insightful)
From my old server...
login as: root
Re:Troll-in-one (Score:2)
This is posted, possibly by a bot, whenever there is an openbsd article.
Re:Troll-in-one (Score:2)
Re:Troll-in-one (Score:1)
Linux Returned 112 million articles
BSD returned 7.6 million articles
OS/2 returned 4.4 million articles
CP/M returned 100 thousand articles
So BSD is not dying, by any means. It is stable, scalable, and every web site on Netcraft's top 50 (http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html ) longest uptime list is a *BSD variant! Dead?
Re:Immature OS (Score:2)
He's an asshole. So is Rieser. So is Stallman. A lot of the people in the open source community are. Who cares? You don't have to deal with him.
Re:Immature OS (Score:2)
You base this opinion on your opinion of Theo?
I know of two major banks which use OpenBSD for their firewalls. I've received this info from insiders on independant occasions without asking (was a comment in passing, during conversation, regarding my use of OpenBSD).
The source is there and people do use OpenBSD's tree and their own private tree's for real
Re:Immature OS (Score:1)
Thats your loss. OpenBSD is a great system and just because Theo can come across as rude and arrogant doesn't mean he can't pull together a great system.
I try to respect people for what they do well, not hate them for their faults.
OpenBSD, W2k - dual boot? (Score:1)
and NTFS? currently Im running w2k (on fat32 which sucks) and OBSD3.3 - and GAG [sourceforge.net]
- due the new (?) NTFS Support [openbsd.org]it should work if GAG is installed on a w2k boot partion - or am I totally wrong? (I know I should have posted this to misc@openbsd.org - which Ill do in the evening..)
Re:OpenBSD, W2k - dual boot? (Score:1)
Re:OpenBSD, W2k - dual boot? (Score:1)
Where to download 'unoffical' ISO's? (Score:1, Troll)
But i dont..
Still a crock (Score:2)
I understand he wants to continue to be funded, but pissing people off in the process isnt a good way to do it.
Its kept my $ going to the FBSD camp instead of theo, due to the attitude.
Why violate? (Score:2)
Simple as that.
I normally use FBSD anyway, but i like to keep a collection of current alternatives to look at.
And I dont want to screw with having to create my own install ( and network isntalls are not acceptable, i do tests offline.. )