Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

GCC 3.3 Native Build For NetBSD/dreamcast 19

Posted by Hemos on Monday June 16, 2003 @06:30AM from the building-it-for-the-machine dept.

Dan writes "Marcus Comstedt has a native build of the new GCC 3.3 for NetBSD/dreamcast platform. It was built using the latest binutils (2.13.2.1), and he then rebuilt the binutils with the new compiler. Also included is a gdb 5.3 built with the GCC and binutils."

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

GCC 3.3 Native Build For NetBSD/dreamcast

Load All Comments

Search 19 Comments Log In/Create an Account

Comments Filter:

Binutils 2.14 is out (Score:4, Informative)

by geirt ( 55254 ) writes: on Monday June 16, 2003 @06:50AM (#6210745)

It was built using the latest binutils (2.13.2.1)

Too late, binutils 2.14 [redhat.com] is released ....

Share
twitter facebook
Enough memory for this? (Score:4, Interesting)

by bjb ( 3050 ) writes: on Monday June 16, 2003 @07:33AM (#6210986) Homepage Journal

I've run GCC on machines with 16MB of memory before, but they also had at least several megabytes of swap storage as well. Will GCC even be able to compile anything on this box?
I know there is the relatively unused serial port in the back of the thing, but has anyone even developed a mass storage device for the Dreamcast?

Share
twitter facebook
- Re:Enough memory for this? (Score:2, Interesting)
  
  by robotbrain ( 579211 ) writes:
  
  Here is a link [slashdot.org] but the original site seems to be dead now. :(
  - Yeah the original site is dead... because.. (Score:1)
    
    by voxel ( 70407 ) writes:
    
    It was running on a dreamcast and the site op fired up GCC..
- Re:They should move these dreamcast articles (Score:3, Insightful)
  
  by agent dero ( 680753 ) writes:
  
  I would say you're an obvious Windows Turd.
  
  Lots of people care, this is another victory for NetBSD and the BSD community.
  Why? [netbsd.org]
  
  My take on the NetBSD idea, is not why, but why not?
  If you can run NetBSD on a dreamcast, or any other piece of equipement with a CPU, then you can have a simple firewalling router, or a file server. The possibilities aren't endless, but there's a lot.
  - - Re:They should move these dreamcast articles (Score:2)
      
      by TheRaven64 ( 641858 ) writes:
      
      LOOK OUT! NERD ALERT!!
      Umm, you know this is /., right? As in 'News for Nerds. Stuff that matters.'?
Inconceivable (Score:5, Insightful)

by Neon Spiral Injector ( 21234 ) writes: on Monday June 16, 2003 @12:03PM (#6213839)

Shouldn't he also have rebuilt gcc with the new binutils? Then rebuilt binutils with that resulting gcc?

BTW: I just symlink the binutils source directory from inside the gcc source directory (i.e. ln -s ../binutils-2.13.2.1 binutils) and then "make bootstrap-lean". This takes care of the interdependancies. You can also do the same for flex and bison.

Share
twitter facebook

There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.

GCC 3.3 Native Build For NetBSD/dreamcast 19

GCC 3.3 Native Build For NetBSD/dreamcast More Login

GCC 3.3 Native Build For NetBSD/dreamcast

Binutils 2.14 is out (Score:4, Informative)

Enough memory for this? (Score:4, Interesting)

Re:Enough memory for this? (Score:2, Interesting)

Yeah the original site is dead... because.. (Score:1)

Re:They should move these dreamcast articles (Score:3, Insightful)

Re:They should move these dreamcast articles (Score:2)

Inconceivable (Score:5, Insightful)

Related Links Top of the: day, week, month.

Slashdot Top Deals

Slashdot