No FreeBSD 3.5 On CD From WC/BSDI 14
xlogan writes, "I just received my FreeBSD 4.0 subscription CD in the mail today. According to a memo inside, they will NOT be shipping a 3.5 CD (the last of the 3.X series) and instead sent out this 4.0 CD. 3.5 will be available for FTP download in May." S'true. It was decided that the extended testing period before releasing 4.0 was so effective that the CD sets would continue with the 4.x releases, rather than the 3.x branch. This is contrary to earlier releases (in particular, 3.0). Of course, 3.5 will still be available for download, but if you've got a CD subscription from WC you'll get 4.0.
FreeBSD 4.0 (Score:1)
It's funny, though, because I am not worried in the least bit about putting a
So, it's probably not such a big deal that they're just skipping the 3.5 CD's.
Re:FreeBSD 4.0 (Score:1)
As a side note
-sirket
Why not both? (Score:1)
new market? (Score:2)
seems like they'll be creating an opportunity for smaller companies to sell 3.5... I'm sure many people are not sure about upgrading, or don't plan to right away. Someone with a cd burner and a fast connection could probably do pretty well selling 3.5. Just a thought...
darren
Cthulhu for President! [cthulhu.org]
Re:FreeBSD 4.0 (Score:1)
Not a big deal (Score:2)
Most of the interest in 3.5 will be from those who want to continue tracking 3.x on an existing installation. You can use CD's to do a binary upgrade, but upgrades are far better handled by cvs'ing the source and making world.
Re:new market? (Score:1)
And of course, if that someone realized that he didn't have to download the CD image each time he was going to burn it, a mere CD burner would do the trick. ;-)
Re:new market? (Score:1)
No FreeBSD 3.5 from WC/BSDI (Score:1)
speaking of no 3.5 fbsd (Score:2)
Re:speaking of no 3.5 fbsd (Score:1)
--
Re:speaking of no 3.5 fbsd (Score:1)
End users? Who cares! (Score:1)
I was looking forward to a FreeBSD 3.5 CD. I still have systems that are running 2.2.7 (patched for security). I also have a rule that says I have CDs for anything I run (with floppies for the patches).
I think this really brings out several issues about open source development that are fundamental...1) The press for newer better faster (i.e. 4.0) is driven by hacking not stability or consumer (in amateur radio it's called 'appliance' users) users.
2) BSDI/WC didn't ask us with zillions of systems in production what we would like. We're increasingly irrelevant to the massive hacking hordes. This is less true with Linux; only because IPO fever has struck over there and with BSDI/WC it isn't quite there yet.
3) 3.x is nearing stagnation, because there is no glory to maintaining it. Just as there is no fix for SMP NetATalk which regularly will panic and cause reboots -- bug killing and back porting are both hard work and very inglorious. You get no fame for "oh I finally killed this bug that impacted 10% of the production systems" but do get fame and commit privs for a new (maybe un-needed, perhaps "cleaner") scheme to do disk I/O or devices or network or
I'm not mad about this, just realistic that this is a social community with it's own value system. It just happens to be a value system that doesn't help those who are trying to *do* things with this O/S.
Will this get better? I have no idea. There has been some discussion on the FBSD IRC about improved regression testing which will make back porting a little easier and siginicantly improve stability.
The BSDI purchase means there is an IPO on the horizon which will, at least for a moment, make for improved bug response. I wonder if the BSDI/WC folks know what it means to operations be a 'public company'? Perhaps they really don't care -- IPO, count 181 days and retire.
One thing's for sure... we're about to find out the brave new ways of BSDI/WC... be they good or be they bad. I wonder if not pressing 3.5 is just the beginning.
FreeBSD 3.5 (Score:1)
Please DO THIS!