Raq'ing up NetBSD 8
Got a Cobalt Raq 2, but want to keep your BSD fetish going? If so, Soren Jorvang's announcement of a prelimenary port to this particular piece of blue iron should be right up your street.
There is no opinion so absurd that some philosopher will not express it. -- Marcus Tullius Cicero, "Ad familiares"
Re:I still don't understand this (Score:1)
As a consequence the effort required to adopt a new platform is a lot less.
How many people today can say that "I ported UNIX to a new hardware platform" With NetBSD you can.
There are several ports brought up from nothing to booting into single or multiuser by 1 or 2 people before anyone else gets involved.
Re:I still don't understand this (Score:2)
---
Consult, v. t. To seek another's approval of a course already decided on.
Re:I still don't understand this (Score:3)
While there may be a few semi-ridiculous ports flying around, what I can't understand is how someone could get bent out of shape about someone porting BSD to a server platform. It makes all the sense in the world, and I could give you 1,000,000 reasons why someone might want to run BSD on a server.
Relax a little. This one makes sense.
---
Consult, v. t. To seek another's approval of a course already decided on.
Re:I still don't understand this (Score:3)
I think the best reason is for consistency. One of the things I like about Linux and the BSD's is that they run on a lot of hardware. If I get a PowerPC for my desk, and I happen to not like the MacOS (!!!), then I like the fact that there are other options (quite a few in this case). Running NetBSD, or Linux, or whatever on my Intel box, my Sparc, and my PPC means consistency from box to box. Yeah, the binaries are not compatible, but the source is -- I can actually utilize the PPC hardware to its fullest potential if I put NetBSD on it rather than the MacOS.
darren
Cthulhu for President! [cthulhu.org]