That was a response to Linus saying "the OpenBSD crowd is a bunch of masturbating monkeys." http://www.zdnet.com/article/l... [zdnet.com]
Ouch.
Wow, not even the alternative OS's are free from drama -- sad to see Linus (Linux) and Theo (OpenBSD) having to resort to name calling over "best practices" about security.
I think Linus said it quite well at Debcon '14 (IIRC), when an audience member said that he was extremely disappointed with Linus and others, because of the childish name-calling and bickering.
Basically, Linus' stance is that he doesn't care if he offends people, he speaks his mind on issues, the way he sees them. It's much better to be direct and maybe a bit abrasive.
From what I've read, Theo has pretty much the same philosophy. If he thinks something is bullshit, he'll damn well tell you, and not always i
> If your software was in control of nuclear missles you would have killed everyone twice. And what's the bug count for the Linux kernel or GNU/Linux system?? Compared to OpenBSD, Linux is insecure out-of-the-box.
> if your compiler has a bug and there
We are drowning in information but starved for knowledge.
-- John Naisbitt, Megatrends
Linus and Theo in a pissing contest (again) (Score:5, Informative)
Two things caught my eye in the release notes:
Security improvements:
* Remove systrace.
* Remove Linux emulation support.
Theo has some cool slides about "Pledge" that replaced systrace. Slide 3 has this "gem":
"Loudmouth Linus"
http://www.openbsd.org/papers/... [openbsd.org]
Note: NSFW
That was a response to Linus saying "the OpenBSD crowd is a bunch of masturbating monkeys."
http://www.zdnet.com/article/l... [zdnet.com]
Ouch.
Wow, not even the alternative OS's are free from drama -- sad to see Linus (Linux) and Theo (OpenBSD) having to resort to name calling over "best practices" about security.
Theo might be getting the last laugh though:
http://www.openbsd.org/papers/... [openbsd.org]
http://www.openbsd.org/papers/... [openbsd.org]
I guess if name calling helps make the OS's better so be it. :-)
Re: (Score:2)
What some people don't seem to understand is:
- name calling happens in business to, all the time.
- but OpenBSD and Linux development happens in the open
Re: (Score:2)
Oh come on, Linus and Theo are both very well known for trolling other people relentlessly... That's part of the fun of these two characters...
Until you find yourself their target, that is.
Re: (Score:2)
I think Linus said it quite well at Debcon '14 (IIRC), when an audience member said that he was extremely disappointed with Linus and others, because of the childish name-calling and bickering.
Basically, Linus' stance is that he doesn't care if he offends people, he speaks his mind on issues, the way he sees them. It's much better to be direct and maybe a bit abrasive.
From what I've read, Theo has pretty much the same philosophy. If he thinks something is bullshit, he'll damn well tell you, and not always i
Re: (Score:2)
Whoa, calm down.
> Every fucking release has mountains of errors flaws holes and bugs.
So does every OS. There is no "magic code" where there are zero bugs.
> https://www.openbsd.org/errata... [openbsd.org]
I count 25 issues. Doesn't look like a "mountain" to me.
> If your software was in control of nuclear missles you would have killed everyone twice.
And what's the bug count for the Linux kernel or GNU/Linux system?? Compared to OpenBSD, Linux is insecure out-of-the-box.
> if your compiler has a bug and there