by Anonymous Coward writes:
on Friday September 02, 2016 @10:31AM (#52814845)
No, by far the best feature is that there is NO way to patch the system unless you build and distribute those patches yourself.
What a great, great fucking way to keep an OS secure. Dont have an inbox way of updating the fucking thing when there is errata.
AND BOY, there is errata. Every fucking release has mountains of errors flaws holes and bugs.
https://www.openbsd.org/errata59.html
All of this shit is fixed with source patches. Imagine this, Theo de Fucking Ass Rat, if your compiler has a bug and there is no way to get a patched compiler you have to go through an entire compiler bootstrap to be sure the patch for the compiler works.
Fuck you Theo The Rat. Secure by default? My ass! You had two remote holes so far. Good job. If your software was in control of nuclear missles you would have killed everyone twice.
Yes, shitstemD is a fucking stain. Yes Lennart Poettering is a god damned faggot father fucking piece of low life scum dog shit puke. Anyone who thinks ShitStemD isnt shit is a fucking asshole.
But OpenBSD, fuck you for no binary patches, fuck you, LIAR, LIAR, LIAR. You fucking dicklicking puke fucks should have offered a for-pay service to get binary patches but instead you just offer to give your users a prostate milking by putting your spiky puffer fish in our assholes and smashing it around.
> If your software was in control of nuclear missles you would have killed everyone twice. And what's the bug count for the Linux kernel or GNU/Linux system?? Compared to OpenBSD, Linux is insecure out-of-the-box.
> if your compiler has a bug and there
We are drowning in information but starved for knowledge.
-- John Naisbitt, Megatrends
Linus and Theo in a pissing contest (again) (Score:5, Informative)
Two things caught my eye in the release notes:
Security improvements:
* Remove systrace.
* Remove Linux emulation support.
Theo has some cool slides about "Pledge" that replaced systrace. Slide 3 has this "gem":
"Loudmouth Linus"
http://www.openbsd.org/papers/... [openbsd.org]
Note: NSFW
That was a response to Linus saying "the OpenBSD crowd is a bunch of masturbating monkeys."
http://www.zdnet.com/article/l... [zdnet.com]
Ouch.
Wow, not even the alternative OS's are free from drama -- sad to see Linus (Linux) and Theo (OpenBSD) having to reso
Re:Linus and Theo in a pissing contest (again) (Score:0)
No, by far the best feature is that there is NO way to patch the system unless you build and distribute those patches yourself.
What a great, great fucking way to keep an OS secure. Dont have an inbox way of updating the fucking thing when there is errata.
AND BOY, there is errata. Every fucking release has mountains of errors flaws holes and bugs.
https://www.openbsd.org/errata59.html
All of this shit is fixed with source patches. Imagine this, Theo de Fucking Ass Rat, if your compiler has a bug and there is no way to get a patched compiler you have to go through an entire compiler bootstrap to be sure the patch for the compiler works.
Fuck you Theo The Rat. Secure by default? My ass! You had two remote holes so far. Good job. If your software was in control of nuclear missles you would have killed everyone twice.
Yes, shitstemD is a fucking stain. Yes Lennart Poettering is a god damned faggot father fucking piece of low life scum dog shit puke. Anyone who thinks ShitStemD isnt shit is a fucking asshole.
But OpenBSD, fuck you for no binary patches, fuck you, LIAR, LIAR, LIAR. You fucking dicklicking puke fucks should have offered a for-pay service to get binary patches but instead you just offer to give your users a prostate milking by putting your spiky puffer fish in our assholes and smashing it around.
Re: (Score:2)
Whoa, calm down.
> Every fucking release has mountains of errors flaws holes and bugs.
So does every OS. There is no "magic code" where there are zero bugs.
> https://www.openbsd.org/errata... [openbsd.org]
I count 25 issues. Doesn't look like a "mountain" to me.
> If your software was in control of nuclear missles you would have killed everyone twice.
And what's the bug count for the Linux kernel or GNU/Linux system?? Compared to OpenBSD, Linux is insecure out-of-the-box.
> if your compiler has a bug and there