As an active pfSense user I think they have excellent points there, especially regarding root access and security issues. I think this fork might put more pressure on the pfSense team and eventually benefit everybody.
They have a lot of drama between them, but pfsense still seems superior, especially since as I understand it, the current 2.3 beta is a mostly unpatched FreeBSD, I hear they only have patches on some of the vendor specific drivers....which reminds me I need to file a bug about a crappy broadcom ethernet chip.
opnonsense (Score:2)
am i the only one who read it as opnonsense?
Re: (Score:0)
I read it as NOPsense, as in the assembly command NOPeration, and then (pf)sense.
Speaking of which, what's wrong with pfSense? Why do we need another BSD-based firewall distro?
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
This [opnsense.org] should explain it.
Re: opnonsense (Score:0)
As an active pfSense user I think they have excellent points there, especially regarding root access and security issues. I think this fork might put more pressure on the pfSense team and eventually benefit everybody.
Re: opnonsense (Score:2)