They have a lot of drama between them, but pfsense still seems superior, especially since as I understand it, the current 2.3 beta is a mostly unpatched FreeBSD, I hear they only have patches on some of the vendor specific drivers....which reminds me I need to file a bug about a crappy broadcom ethernet chip.
I remember quite clearly reading posts about this being not much more than a repackaging of PfSense, and that they had some technical problems. So I am using PfSense. I am sorry, running late here, cannot be bothered to search for the link atm.
The decision doesn't have to be logical; it was unanimous.
opnonsense (Score:2)
am i the only one who read it as opnonsense?
Re: (Score:0)
I read it as NOPsense, as in the assembly command NOPeration, and then (pf)sense.
Speaking of which, what's wrong with pfSense? Why do we need another BSD-based firewall distro?
Re:opnonsense (Score:2, Informative)
This [opnsense.org] should explain it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)