by Anonymous Coward writes:
on Tuesday May 18, 1999 @10:44PM (#1887461)
FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD all would have performed nearly the same. Its just a matter of preference. Linux is HARDLY a "slow" webserver.
Well have a look to what a FreeBSD developer says about Linux VM [backplane.com]. Very clean, but not designed to survive under high load. Face it, the FreeBSD people focus on performance, and FreeBSD might well be faster than Linux for high load. Now the same couldn't be necessary be said for NetBSD and OpenBSD.
Re:Well since ZDnet and Mindcraft have proven... (Score:1)
Well have a look to what a FreeBSD developer says about Linux VM [backplane.com]. Very clean, but not designed to survive under high load. Face it, the FreeBSD people focus on performance, and FreeBSD might well be faster than Linux for high load.
Now the same couldn't be necessary be said for NetBSD and OpenBSD.