This certainly sounds as if the concern is with OpenBSD - however, reading the summary, it's obvious this is being done because of concerns with the current state of Linux's kernel, and they see the OpenBSD kernel as a better option.
Taking a pragmatic point of view - I'd think their time would be better spent leaving the OpenBSD kernel alone and focussing more on addressing (what some might perceive as) the lack of a quality
That's one poorly-written submission title (Score:3)
"FSF-Approved Hyperbola GNU/Linux Forking OpenBSD, Citing 'User Freedom' Concerns"
This certainly sounds as if the concern is with OpenBSD - however, reading the summary, it's obvious this is being done because of concerns with the current state of Linux's kernel, and they see the OpenBSD kernel as a better option.
Taking a pragmatic point of view - I'd think their time would be better spent leaving the OpenBSD kernel alone and focussing more on addressing (what some might perceive as) the lack of a quality
Re:That's one poorly-written submission title (Score:2)
Thought I was having a stroke while trying to parse it.