I'm waiting for OpenBSD to give up on creating a modern kernel and focus on what they do best: create hardened network applications & a clean base system. A freebsd / openbsd fusion would give linux a run for their money.
I'm waiting for OpenBSD to give up on creating a modern kernel and focus on what they do best: create hardened network applications & a clean base system. A freebsd / openbsd fusion would give linux a run for their money.
I wish that were so. *BSDs (all of them) still lack HA and failover clustering software. Until that is there, *BSD is not a viable alternative.
openbsd kernel (Score:-1, Flamebait)
I'm waiting for OpenBSD to give up on creating a modern kernel and focus on what they do best: create hardened network applications & a clean base system. A freebsd / openbsd fusion would give linux a run for their money.
Re: (Score:0)
I'm waiting for OpenBSD to give up on creating a modern kernel and focus on what they do best: create hardened network applications & a clean base system. A freebsd / openbsd fusion would give linux a run for their money.
I wish that were so. *BSDs (all of them) still lack HA and failover clustering software. Until that is there, *BSD is not a viable alternative.
Re: (Score:4, Funny)
*BSDs (all of them) still lack HA and failover clustering software.
Ironic in a story about an OS release that features improved HA networking.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:openbsd kernel (Score:2)