I'm waiting for OpenBSD to give up on creating a modern kernel and focus on what they do best: create hardened network applications & a clean base system. A freebsd / openbsd fusion would give linux a run for their money.
I'm waiting for OpenBSD to give up on creating a modern kernel and focus on what they do best: create hardened network applications & a clean base system. A freebsd / openbsd fusion would give linux a run for their money.
I wish that were so. *BSDs (all of them) still lack HA and failover clustering software. Until that is there, *BSD is not a viable alternative.
openbsd kernel (Score:-1, Flamebait)
I'm waiting for OpenBSD to give up on creating a modern kernel and focus on what they do best: create hardened network applications & a clean base system. A freebsd / openbsd fusion would give linux a run for their money.
Re: (Score:0)
I'm waiting for OpenBSD to give up on creating a modern kernel and focus on what they do best: create hardened network applications & a clean base system. A freebsd / openbsd fusion would give linux a run for their money.
I wish that were so. *BSDs (all of them) still lack HA and failover clustering software. Until that is there, *BSD is not a viable alternative.
Re:openbsd kernel (Score:2)
Do you have any clue who is responsible for developing Common Address Redundancy Protocol?
You have other options too,
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/sysutils/heartbeat/ [freebsd.org]
or for a DRBD eqiv, try ggated + gmirror
http://serverbbs.ccw.com.cn/thread-14564-1-1.html [ccw.com.cn]