... was to make the damn thing secure. That's why it exists. And they still failed. It's like selling a bread that doesn't taste or has the same ingredients like a real bread. But you still call it bread and sell it. These companies should be boycotted. It's our security that we're talking about! There should be repercussions for these kind of failures!
This *is* the general sentiment, but the fact is that there is only very few companies that can satisfy corporate needs in this area and all of these companies are ridden with identical problems. You'd essentially have to boycott them all.
Can you name one product manufacturer with this type of computer-related scale that does *not* have security vulnerabilities? CISCO is certainly not immune.
We are drowning in information but starved for knowledge.
-- John Naisbitt, Megatrends
All they had to do (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:All they had to do (Score:2)
These companies should be boycotted.
This *is* the general sentiment, but the fact is that there is only very few companies that can satisfy corporate needs in this area and all of these companies are ridden with identical problems. You'd essentially have to boycott them all.
Re: (Score:1)
CISCO is certainly not immune.