Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Idle

+ - Death Star is not economical: too much metal->

Submitted by Tablizer
Tablizer (95088) writes "Washington Post: "Should we build a Death Star? This debate picked up this year after some Lehigh University students estimated that just the steel for a Death Star would cost $852 quadrillion, or 13,000 times the current GDP of the Earth...Death Star is a bit misunderstood. It is primarily a tool of domestic politics rather than warfare, and should be compared to alternative means of suppressing the population of a galaxy. Second, as a weapon of war, it should be compared to alternative uses of scarce defense resources. Understood properly, the Death Star is not worth it."
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Death Star is not economical: too much metal

Comments Filter:

"In the face of entropy and nothingness, you kind of have to pretend it's not there if you want to keep writing good code." -- Karl Lehenbauer

Working...