Will GPLv3 Drive Users from Linux to FreeBSD? 374
An anonymous reader writes "Last week ZDNet put up an article asking a simple question: will GPL3 drive Linux users to FreeBSD? It's based on issues raised in the August FreeBSD Foundation Newsletter. That publication features a letter by the vice president of the FreeBSD Foundation, Justin Gibbs, arguing that the GPLv3 restricts the rights of commercial users of open source software, and is just the FSF's first step in changing the GPL in ways that authors of GPL software may not have intended. He suggests that commercial users should seriously consider BSD-licensed software as an alternative if they want to be able to safely ship products in the future. This is especially in light of requirements from the FCC that software running on devices (such as software-defined radios) be end-user replaceable. Gibbs states that the FreeBSD Foundation will provide an alternative to GPLv3'd software, especially in light of Stallman's statement that further GPL revisions are due in the near future. Is this likely to cause discontent among Linux users, or will they mostly ignore it?"
This could be a good thing. (Score:4, Interesting)
But please, leave the attitude that i see too often in the linux world community. We don't need it on this side of the street.
( attitude is one reason i left the linux camp long ago. And i was there in the very beginning.)
Not a chance. (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:This could be a good thing. (Score:4, Interesting)
linux user here (Score:3, Interesting)
i welcome the competition the *BSDs will bring to the Linux world, and if Ian Murdock can get Solaris in the mix that will be good also...
GPLv3 does hurt, however... (Score:4, Interesting)
Their release of the prototype code was "whatever", so they did it under GPL (well, dual liscence, GPL for everyone, and a free liscence for funders). They were kind of shocked when the link on their web page was now pointing to a GPLv3 description, and I explained the implications.
They may very well change to BSD liscencing.
BSD: providing unencumbered software for 30 years (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:This could be a good thing. (Score:3, Interesting)
If anything's going to drive people away from Linux to FreeBSD, it's things like changing the VM subsystem or scheduler in the middle of a 'stable' series. I've been running FreeBSD 7-CURRENT (the unstable branch) on my ThinkPad for the last few months, and I've had far fewer problems with it than trying to run even a stable release of Linux.
Re:Get Real (Score:3, Interesting)
Take for example IBM. They have added a whole lot of features to the linux offering in the hope that the services around linux would more than make up for their efforts. If they would have done this on BSD (and why wouldn't they have, you wonder. Didn't they think this through? BSD is so much more business friendly?), any other company could use their enhancements, add their own code, pack it up and sell the enhanced offering with exclusive services around it. IBM would have a reduced offering compared to their competition as the competition has everything IBM has done (and is still doing), but have kept their enhancements private. IBM would always have a worse offering than this competition, forcing it instantly to adding features. tit for tat.
As for Apple's BSD contributions. Apologies (also to the other siblings of this post pointing that out). I was not clear: I was thinking about features, not bugfixes. It of course makes a whole lot of sense that when building upon something, you would contribute bugfixes back to the upstream to minimize maintainance. However, how many actual features have been added by Apple to BSD? How many drivers? Does FreeBSD now runs flawless on Mac hardware due to the presence of up-to-date drivers to all hardware Apple is selling? Is OpenGL support at an all time high? Does the videocam work under freeBSD? Can I get Aqua for FreeBSD, without running Os-X? How much of Apple's 'intellectual property' can now be found in BSD? I don't really know, and it could be that Apple has transformed FreeBSD in the desktop unix of choice (at the expense of OSX), but color me a bit sceptical.