OpenBSD 3.7 Reviewed 197
busfahrer writes "Jem Matzan has written a review of OpenBSD 3.7 for Newsforge. He talks about their licensing issues, network features, upgrading packages and the new supported architectures."
If you think the system is working, ask someone who's waiting for a prompt.
Re:Declare your bias, why don't you? (Score:5, Informative)
RTFA. The issue mentioned is that OpenBSD folks object to the Apache 2 licence, and so OpenBSD won't get Apache 2.
Re:Declare your bias, why don't you? (Score:5, Informative)
Fact 2: GPL isn't free enough to allow merging in BSD licensed code.
No, the modified BSD licence - which everyone uses nowadays - allows you to mix BSD and GPL code. The result is always GPL.
But that's not the issue here - RTFA.
Re:Declare your bias, why don't you? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Declare your bias, why don't you? (Score:5, Informative)
The whole point of the recent OpenBSD wireless developments are that the drivers are completely free!
Stallman gave Theo de Raadt the 2004 FSF award in Febuary [slashdot.org] as recognition for crying out loud!
FUDster. (Score:3, Informative)
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=127944&cid=10
Re:No troll, I'm dead serious and love OpenBSD (Score:2, Informative)
Re: That's it (Score:4, Informative)
In fact, the main differences are technical, in their very goals: while FreeBSD focuses mainly on features and i386 performance, OpenBSD focuses mainly on code correctness and security.
>Do these two share between each other?
Sure they do - and massively.
For example, one little jewel that came from OpenBSD to the other *BSDs is pf (packet filter) [openbsd.org], that has an excellent reputation for its being very clean and easy to use.
>Is there a common BSD kernel or anything like that?
No.
The *BSDs are developed like OSes, not "distros". So, while they massively share code, they maintain their own kernels.
To better understand the differences, it helps to notice that OpenBSD was born as a NetBSD fork, 8 years ago - and even today, it shares more code with NetBSD than with FreeBSD.
But to understand even better, well.. FreeBSD and OpenBSD are renowned for their excellent documentation, that is well worth having a look at.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/
http://openbsd.org/faq/index.html [openbsd.org]
--
Requiem for the FUD [slashdot.org]
Re:There is less reason to review OpenBSD. (Score:3, Informative)
Now that's pure BS. Upgrades with OpenBSD are far simpler by any account. It mainly has to do with the underlying OS being simpler (elegant, whatever), but no question it is simpler.
Those instructions are quite verbose, and really talk a lot about borderline cases that most everyone can ignore. Files in
Okay Troll, I'm done with you. Go away.