FreeBSD Status Report March-April 2004 63
Anonymous Coward writes "The FreeBSD project has posted a new status report
for March and April of 2004. Work continues on locking down the network
stack, ACPI made more great strides, an ARM port appeared in the tree,
and the FreeBSD 4.10 release cycle wrapped up."
Interesting note from the SMPng status report.. (Score:3, Interesting)
Same Alan Cox of Linux kernel hacking fame? Woot! We've attracted him to the dark side... ;)
Re:An ARM port eh? (Score:2, Interesting)
Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:PF and ALTQ (Score:4, Interesting)
What you'll notice with OpenBSD is that you're discouraged from messing with the kernel at all, and ports work better. Theoretically, you may notice it's slower, and you'll probably notice that the software isn't as up to date. Debian-stable should also be in consideration, depending on your needs, but its firewalling capabilities are well behind FreeBSD and OpenBSD.
You're giving something up if you commit to anything period. FreeBSD and OpenBSD have dramatically disjoint sets of stuff they're good at. I've never seen an OS good enough at everything (or even most things) to make it worth commiting to. Not if you can deal with multiple OSes on a day to day basis.
One true ports system? (Score:3, Interesting)
dead trees! (Score:5, Interesting)
I know a birthday present for this year!
Re:PowerPC port (Score:1, Interesting)