BSDCon '03 Nearly Here (OpenBSD 3.4, Too) 332
An anonymous reader writes "Pre-orders for the OpenBSD project's latest release, 3.4, are now being taken. This release will ship around November 1st. Significant enhancements have been made in this release, including i386 switch to ELF executable format, further W^X improvements for i386, ld.so on ELF platforms now loads libraries in a random order for greater resistance to attacks, inclusion of a static bounds checker to the compiler for basic checks on functions which accept buffers and sizes, strcpy/strcat function audit to replace with safer strlcpy/strlcat, ProPolice stack protection in the kernel, further manual page cleanups, large number of bug fixes and optimizations to the packet filter (PF) including packet tagging, stateful TCP normalization, passive OS detection, SYN proxy, and adaptive state timeouts, and many other improvements to the rest of the system.
Order a CD from the OpenBSD store. Ordering a CD helps support the project, as a bonus you get cool stickers, artwork, and an audio track!"
The same reader sent links to more information on this release, including new features, and the changelog between 3.3 and 3.4.
Buzz Buzz Buzz (Score:2, Interesting)
I know, but... (Score:0, Interesting)
FreeBSD filesystem (Score:2, Interesting)
So anyway, how does FreeBSD's filesystem stack up against Linux?
one issue that should be hot on the table (Score:3, Interesting)
Any linux related (binary compat in this case) that wants to move or shake should investigate ximian compatability....
I for one welcome out new ximian overlords.
Imagine a schimick GUI interface, FreeBSD underneath, all you'd need is a cheese grater aluminum case......
removing some utilities (Score:3, Interesting)
Anyone know why OpenBSD is removing GNU tools
OpenBSD 3.4 song? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:FreeBSD filesystem (Score:5, Interesting)
This could well be a good phd project for someone who wants to work on a thesis project that gives back to the community, and would surely secure them a job at Oracle or one of the other Big Data Storage Management companies.
Re:removing some utilities (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:FreeBSD filesystem (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:removing some utilities (Score:3, Interesting)
While I'm greatful I have these tools for free, and they have served me well, they are not without brain damage. For example, I found to my horror that 'patch' will, under certain circumstances, seek out and change my original files used to generate a patch, instead of what a reasonable reader would think to be the target files (the ones marked with "+++"). This is in fact documented behaviour, presumably thought to be good by some well-meaning but confused soul.
Here, the argument of continuity apparently outweighs that of sanity. Solution: fork. Maybe with a little competition, the gnu utilities will eventually get updated to get rid of that nasty, destructive behaviour.
Re:Soothing break (Score:1, Interesting)
OpenBSD Journal is dying (not a troll) (Score:5, Interesting)
So, I wonder if anyone here knows of another site that will take-over? BSD-specific, with knowledgable users, and plenty of comments... BSDforums has a large number of factors working against it, keeping it from becomming anything really good, so rule that one out.
The BSD section here at
Any suggestions?
Re:removing some utilities (Score:4, Interesting)
absolutely! The BSD license implicitly encourages companies to share patches "upstream" because it will make future forking easier. The companies that used "forked" BSD software do not want to maintain tons of separate bug fixes in a different codebase. They just want to copy other people's work. That sounds "evil", but it does provide a strong incentive to share a common codebase.
Re:Buzz Buzz Buzz (Score:1, Interesting)
First of all: "they aren't even trying to win-over business IT departments."
Personally I wouldn't want to use an OS that is designed for that reason, why do you think Windows is the way it is today? An OS should be designed to be secure, bug free, well documented, and at the end of the day, just damn well do what it's supposed to do. Nothing else.
Do you think that the FreeBSD team tries to win over IT departments when they write code? You're kidding, right? Thought you were, had me going there for a second. OpenBSD won over my IT department for a firewall. Why? Not because they tried to for the sake of it, but because it just fucking works and is secure at the same time. (being free, minus CD cost, was a bonus)
Please give this some more thought.
Keynote: Computing fallacies (Score:2, Interesting)
Since this very presentation was discussed on
Re:OpenBSD Journal is dying (not a troll) (Score:1, Interesting)
Please stop posting on these forums. Your comments are not welcome. Freespeech doesn't apply to people like you.
BSD is not fading out. GET A DAMN CLUE.
OpenBSD, FreeBSD, NetBSD and...lets not forget, APPLE'S MAC OS X - ARE ALL GOING -STRONG-
Just because "CNET" doesn't have hype stories on them everyday, does that make them less of an OS?
Have you been living under a rock? I think so.
There is not much difference to Linux. Linux today is just a distro with a bunch of GUI's tacked on, this is what makes Linux for A LOT of people. Everything else is pretty much available accross the board.
BSD hardware support is more than good enough. All the popular hardware works fine. and sometimes commerical driver support sucks, eg nvidia's drivers. I'd rather the open source community write some of those drivers.
If projects like Mozilla, OpenOffice etc were coded to be a bit more portable, they would be running fine on any BSD. It's not impossible to get Mozilla and OpenOffice (talking desktops here) running on OpenBSD - just takes a bit more effort than it should.
FreeBSD has very good commericial support. You have no idea, really.
Maintream...does it really matter what the kids are using to play their MP3s on? Down with Microsoft! yay! Lets clone the Windows gui!
hobby. Linux is more of a saddled hobby to administer than BSD anyday. FreeBSD and OpenBSD configure and lock down with ease. I can't say I'd use Linux for any of my servers, the stability is just not there.
Anyway that's enough for you, you're just a common troll and you've been fed. Happy?