FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE Status Update 186
Dan writes "FreeBSD Release Engineering Team's Bruce Mah provides the latest status of what's holding up the official release of FreeBSD 4.8. We fully support FreeBSD RE's approach to fixing necessary problems before officially releasing the product."
neat (Score:2, Informative)
Rather than just reformat the floppy as a 1.722MB, they'd rather just get everything fitting onto a 1.44MB. Kudos to you, FreeBSD team!
Here's the text of it from bsdforums.org (Score:4, Informative)
[Read full announcement]
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 16:23:25 -0800
From: "Bruce A. Mah"
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: 4.8-RELEASE status
Hi--
A number of you have been (rightfully) wondering what's up with
the i386 4.8-RELEASE. Here's the current state:
The files that are as of this moment tagged as RELENG_4_8_0_RELEASE
can't be used to build a release because the MFSROOT kernel (that goes
on the kern.flp) overflows a the size of a 1440K floppy disk.
This bug was masked by another problem that happened to be present on
the machines used by the RE team to build releases...namely, that they
didn't have the cvsroot-all collection in their local repositories.
To make a long story short, the $FreeBSD$ tags didn't get expanded in
the source files, thus (I am not making this up) causing the MFSROOT
kernel to be just a *little* bit smaller so that it could fit on a
floppy. I think this was the world's April Fool's joke to the RE
team.
We're currently trying to fix this by finding some other driver we can
move to a module on the mfsroot.flp image (or maybe just eliminate).
After we finish some tests, we'll need to commit whatever change is
required, re-tag the affected files, and then rebuild the base system.
I'm not in a position to comment on a timeline for these happenings.
Thanks for your continued patience!
Bruce.
PS. This may sound rude, for which I apologize in advance: The less
time that the RE team has to spend replying to various emails
(particularly those that are not relevant to the immediate goal of
shipping 4.8-RELEASE), the faster the release is probably going to be
finished.
Re:BSD is cool (Score:4, Informative)
hmm [freebsd.org]
Yes (Score:1, Informative)
Re:neat (Score:2, Informative)
Re:BSD is cool (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Do you guys download Freebsd or buy cd's ? (Score:3, Informative)
It also depends if you have a cd burner... since I have one I download the smallest cd iso for freebsd and do a very basic install and then add to that...
Re:A floppy? (Score:5, Informative)
Anyway, most bootable CDs use floppy images (be it 1.44MB or 2.88MB) as the boot section of the CD... primarily for legacy/compatibility purposes. With that, you still have to deal with the size limitation of either 1.44MB or 2.88MB.
Resolved already... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:A floppy? (Score:2, Informative)
So, for people to be able to boot from CD's on non-Award and AMI BIOS motherboards, the floppy image must fit in 1.44Mb.
This is why I will never buy a fricking PC again, I'm sticking with Mac's and Sun UltraSPARC machines from now.
Re:Do you guys download Freebsd or buy cd's ? (Score:2, Informative)
Other options are listed in the Handbook [freebsd.org].
I definatly recommend downloading rather then buying from people like cheapbytes.
-- Brooks
Re:BSD is cool (Score:2, Informative)
Does it run VMware 3.x or the about-to-be-released 4.x?
I didn't think so. Sorry, I'll stick with Linux even though I feel many things in FreeBSD are coded better.
Seriously, now that the nVidia drivers are ported (sorta; not up to date though) the only reason I don't use FreeBSD is because of VMware. And yes, I know 2.x works, but that version is missing too many things that I need.
Re:confused (Score:4, Informative)
In other words, 5.0 is not production-ready, although it is a complete release. It's still being actively debugged and stabilized in preperation for 5.1, which will probably be the first in the series that I'd put on a production server. The 4.x line is incredibly stable and still being actively maintained in the mean time.
Re:Sounds as if they need better compression (Score:2, Informative)
Re:wait a second... (Score:3, Informative)
Soon maybe [daemonnews.org]
Re:A floppy? (Score:3, Informative)
I don't put CD-ROMs in the servers I build. It's stupid, why would they need CD-ROMs? I just install a floppy drive, because it needs one of those regardless (hardware bios updates, emergency recovery, etc.).
I boot off the install floppies and install via FTP (takes LESS time than via CD when doing so on a T3).
The floppies are extremely important. Many shops rely on them.
Andy
Re:BSD is cool (Score:1, Informative)
1. Install FreeBSD with Linux compatibility layer
2. Bring over a Linux binary of your favorite editor
3. Edit
4. Whack inetd with a HUP
5. Wonder why the ports are still open
It took me a good while to figure out that the damned thing was opening some compatibility version of the