Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
GNU is Not Unix Operating Systems BSD

GNU-Darwin Packages For Mac OS X.1, Darwin-1.4.1 8

Posted by timothy from the ease-of-use dept.
proclus writes: "The GNU-Darwin packages are compatible with Apple's newly released Darwin-1.4.1, and we now have Net Installation instructions for Darwin-only users. Our Bootable Installer CD is now in beta, thanks to the efforts of GNU-Darwin developer rrp. As you can see in the screenshot, our packages work fine with the XFree86 software which is now a part of Apple's Darwin distribution. We have recently packaged the latest versions of Mac OS X.1 compatible OpenSSH and XFree86. (Our older OpenSSH and XFree86 packages appear to be broken.) It is important for OS X.1 users to upgrade their OpenSSH. This is a great time to check out our other packaged offerings, which are also Darwin-1.4.1 and Mac OS X.1 compatible. OSX.1 users who are new to GNU-Darwin might like to try our new Net Installer. Just follow the OS X-specific directions at the top of the script. "
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

GNU-Darwin Packages For Mac OS X.1, Darwin-1.4.1 More

GNU-Darwin Packages For Mac OS X.1, Darwin-1.4.1

Comments Filter:
  • well, maybe not perfect, but even intermediate releases of anything mean imporvements (yay!).
    the simple net installer is a step in the right direction for anything, especially this...

  • A reminder that a portable package standard exists (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward
    Go to Openpackages.org [openpackages.org] and see a standard that supports:
    * FreeBSD
    * NetBSD
    * OpenBSD
    * BSD/OS
    * Darwin
    * Solaris
    * RedHat Linux
    * BeOs
    AIX, HP-UX and Debian have support also.

    • Yeah, I'm still not sure what the goal of "GNU-Darwin" is.

      As near as I can figure, Proclus doesn't think the BSD license is free enough, so he's making an exact clone of OpenPackages with a more restrictive license. Or maybe he thinks that "open" doesn't emphasise freedom enough, so he changed the prefix to one that doesn't contain the letters 'f', 'r', or 'e'.

      I could see someone trying to make a better OpenPackages than OpenPackages, or trying doing the OpenPackages idea in a new and different way. But from where I sit, I see near exact duplication of effort.
  • Another GPL zealot trying to jump onto the OS X bandwagon. Just get the OpenPackages set and be happy.

Slashdot Top Deals

The use of money is all the advantage there is to having money. -- B. Franklin

Close