If I were being launched into space today ...
Displaying poll results.13356 total votes.
Most Votes
- What's the highest dollar price will Bitcoin reach in 2024? Posted on February 28th, 2024 | 8470 votes
- Will ByteDance be forced to divest TikTok Posted on March 20th, 2024 | 6367 votes
Most Comments
- What's the highest dollar price will Bitcoin reach in 2024? Posted on March 20th, 2024 | 68 comments
- Will ByteDance be forced to divest TikTok Posted on March 20th, 2024 | 20 comments
KSP (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:KSP (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
I hear good things... (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
It's movin' on up.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It used to be an Airplane.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
But not as fast as an REO Speed wagon ...
Re: (Score:2)
Just as an aside, my dad drove an REO Speedwagon for a time. Said it was the slowest truck in their entire fleet. He never could figure why America/La France chose them as a firetruck base.
Re: (Score:2)
Woosh.
My own organization (Score:1)
If I'm going into space, I would love for it to be my own endeavor. My own ship, my own mission, etc.
Re: (Score:3)
Famous last words.
Re: (Score:2)
I already have if you would browse my comment history, AC. Emphasis on the C.
Re: My own organization (Score:2)
Millenium Falcon.
I'd have said space x... (Score:3)
... but after the last explosion... I'll take the drugs thanks.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Wouldn't have turned out so bad. The dragon passenger capsule will have an escape system with extra rockets on the sides that would blast it away from the exploding rocket. According to SpaceX, passengers would have survived the recent explosion just fine.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm willing to go in the space x capsule... I just want to be heavily medicated when it happens... so... when it explodes... I will either have a fun time or not notice.
Re: (Score:2)
The capsule may survive the initial breakup, but it is not going to be aerodynamically stable just after the rocket shreds itself in an uncontrolled way.
At near orbital speed that means it shakes you around violently in a small can with a bunch of other objects which probably are not secured well enough to resist flying around during an event like that. You would not be pondering what is coming up long at all, assuming the capsule even survives an uncontrolled reentry from where the rocket breaks up.
The ve
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
as challenger showed, you could still blow up.
I take the drugs thanks.
Cowboy (Score:5, Insightful)
I'd like the mission to be run by CowboyNeal, and have a poll at my side.
Re: (Score:2)
....at the side of the main page
Re: (Score:1)
I'd like the mission to be run by CowboyNeal, and have a poll at my side.
Why are you so mean to Pollish peoples?
Re: (Score:1)
I'm only going if Natalie Portman is also on board.
If I were going onto Slashdot today .... (Score:3)
"I'd like to have a powerful sedative"
Re:I wouldn't use NASA (Score:5, Funny)
FKA (Russia) is the most experienced, and best at putting people people safely into LEO. CNSA is the only other organization that puts people into outer space. I wouldn't use SpaceX, and their flimsy rockets. Oh well.
That's pretty impressive for the California Nursing Students Association. [cnsa.org]
Re: (Score:1, Interesting)
Roscosmos ( Russpace) and abbreviated as FKA () and RKA ().
Interestingly enough, it is likely they will be the only game in town after the global financial meltdown. There isn't anyone that really wants NWO under one world government to absorb the problem at hand, it infringes on native culture of a country and perpetuates the problem that was engineered by the Illuminati and the US bought into it hook, line and sinker. Soviets stand the best chance at having a space program with China at a close second pl
Re: (Score:3)
You're the one who references the Soviets 25 years after they ceased to exist.
Re: (Score:1)
They are post collapse and on the mend, they stand a much better chance at actually having a space program for what is on the venue of economic issues involving being the global reserve currency for the US. The US is just going into the collapse phase so I would put the Russky's ahead of the US on that learning curve. It also looks good on Putin for refusing the continuation of the Illuminati global ponzi scheme by being part of creating NWO under one world government. All that crap is a very slippery sl
Re: (Score:2)
I was pointing out that you appear to be disconnected from reality, not inviting a monologue about it.
Re: (Score:1)
Perhaps I am disconnected from your reality and this I am very happy to be. If the Soviets ceased to exist, then they would not pose a potential threat provoked or not in the future.
Re: (Score:2)
Heute die Welt, Morgen das Sonnensystem!
Re: (Score:1)
Lassen Sie uns die jugendlichen menschlichen Traditionen der Landscharmützel, Macht und Geld , Rindfleisch ist über Glauben und Jedi Mind trix auf diesen Felsen enthaltenen eh zu halten? Rette uns allen viel Peinlichkeit auf lange Sicht . Dann wiederum könnte es recht unterhaltsam zu fortgeschrittenen centient Lebensformen aus der Ferne zu sein, aber sie sind wahrscheinlich nicht einladen würde alles, um ihre Felsen.
Re:I wouldn't use NASA (Score:4, Funny)
Wait, I thought that was the Cowboy Neal Space Agency option.
Re: (Score:1)
Those nurses have a pretty snazzy looking logo. [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
FKA (Russia) is the most experienced, and best at putting people people safely into LEO.
If not for the Nedelin disaster (1960) Russia had a better than good chance of beating the U.S. to the Moon. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
The disaster took out the core of it's space tech, the best they could hope for was to bring a robotically acquired Moon sample back before Apollo 11 did. Which was the race as they were both in space at the same time.
Re:I wouldn't use NASA (Score:4, Informative)
Umm, no.
If you'll go to the trouble of checking, you'll find that the Russians are currently at two failures in 120-low launches, as compared to two failures in 135 launches for Shuttle.
Note that "failure" in this context means "loss of crew in flight".
Ignoring a possible failure at the beginning of their program (very early on, a Russian launch was announced one day, then a few hours later they said, in effect, "never mind - that was actually an unmanned launch". Take that for what you will), and adding Apollo, Gemini, Mercury, Vostok and Voshkod launches to the totals leaves the Russians with a (slightly) worse safety record than NASA. Around 1.5% for both, but the "around" is a little lower for NASA....
Note that the Russians have lost fewer men in space than NASA, but that's largely a side-effect of putting fewer up at a time (four cosmonauts vs 14 astronauts). In mitigation, it might also be noted that NASA has put up far more people than the Russians (~250 for the Russians, ~1000 for NASA).
Re: (Score:1)
So, go to NASA and ask for a quote on a shuttle launch.
Yes, NASA have a better record than Roscosmos. But, since they don't actually have a man rated launch system at the moment, the point is moot.
Re: (Score:2)
The poll didn't say you were fitting the bill, just that you were strapped onto the warhead.
Re: (Score:1)
But NASA don't currently have a warhead.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You forget to mention that the last Russian loss of crew in flight was over 40 years ago, probably before you were born.
Re: (Score:2)
It is a troll. Russia is no better at it than NASA, they have about equal safety records. CrimsonAvenger ran the numbers and gave the infomation comparing both just before your post here, they both have around a 1.5% failure rate.
Re: (Score:1)
In Soviet Space, only Russia can hear you scream, but they don't care, comrade.
If I were being blasted into space today... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
+5 insightful. But you forgot the Cowboy Neal option, because I'd ride him into orbit.
Re: (Score:2)
I think Cowboy Neal would be more likely to want to ride you into orbit.
If I were being launched today... (Score:1)
...I'd like it to be on the largest Orion ever envisioned (the one that would have lifted a city block), and I'd like it to launch from a site within a quarter mile of the Dice office complex. I'd like to make sure whoever decided to inline these damn polls, even after I turned them off in my preferences under the old system, gets a front-row seat to the event.
But NASA launches are (Score:1)
run by private firms
Can IKEA run it? (Score:5, Funny)
I'd like to assemble the spacecraft myself.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Missing Option (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
As stupid as it sounds, I would blindly trust my life to SpaceX. Honestly if you look at what they do and how efficient they are, the other agencies pale in comparison. Yes, yes they are basing many of their technology on existing research, but so are the national agencies. In addition they are aiming at getting the dragon capsule to "inflight abort", something no one has ever achieved. They are quite rigorous in their testing and when they resolved most of the teething problems they will let the national a
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Both of the first stage landings that failed, successfully put their payloads into orbit. They are trying something new that has never been done and doing pretty good at it, but these failures are of the kind that is nice to have, but isn't what they are paid for.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't worry, they seditives are given in Kool-Aid...
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, Valium is definitely a sedative, but you'll probably still be wide awake. Quaaludes and a beer should put you to sleep. I'd recommend against weed though. First, you'll be in the security line so long it would wear off, but the main thing is that a lot of people get paranoid on pot, especially when they're herded in with a couple hundred unknown people and screaming children.
I'd like all systems... (Score:1)
to be made by someone other than the lowest bidder.
JAXA (Score:2)
Japan has rockets too!
Re: (Score:1)
Japan has rockets too!
yes, but it's hard to find Godzilla to boost the rocket into orbit.
obligatory xkcd (Score:2)
Someone with a working "up goer five", please.
https://xkcd.com/1133/ [xkcd.com]
If I were being launched into space today... (Score:2)
Almost everyone is delerious. (Score:1)
There are only two agencies that can launch you into space (on a tested vehicle) today -- Roscosmos (RKA) and the CNSA. Every one saying "ESA", "NASA", "Space-X" or whatever is saying they don't want to go into space today.
How about . . . (Score:1)
Why would anyone vote Nasa? (Score:2)
They don't even have a working space shuttle anymore.
Where is: I'd like to be groped by the TSA? (Score:1)
Hmmm?
Missing option (Score:2)
"I'd like to be dead."
I think it's pretty classy that the discoverer of Pluto has his ashes on-board the spacecraft about to do the fly-by of the planet.....
Wait, one's missing! (Score:2)
The Mexicano Aeronáutica y Spacio Administración (MASA).
Si, fly?
I'd be using a space elevator (Score:1)
But it would have balloons to tether the cable.
Speaking of which, I just literally saw one float by.
Wow, such improvement (Score:2)
If I were being launched today, (Score:2)
I'd offer Timothy my seat on the craft!! ;-)
ashes? (Score:1)
Please hold off on the launch until I discover the planet I want to be launched to. Then my ashes can go by whatever means provides the cheapest space-shipping.
thanks (Score:1)